|
IMPACT OF BIRTH ORDER ON SELF ESTEEM
|
|
|
|
Contents
INTRODUCTION
Birth order plays an important role
in life of every child as family is the first social system to which a child is
exposed. Birth order can give you some important clues about your personality;
your relationship with friends, co-workers, and loved ones; the kind of job you
have; and how you handle problem solving.
THEORY OF EVOLUTION- CHARLES DARWIN.
Study
of birth order started over centuries ago by Charles Darwin, the revolutionary
biologist who proposed the theory of evolution based in natural selection, took
a stance that birth order must impact how an organism travels through life. He
felt that “Children do not inherit special genes for being firstborn or later
born, only genes for engaging successfully in competition for parental
investment”, and this is what leads to differing traits amongst siblings who
have very similar genes. All because methods that work for the firstborn will
eventually spawn counter strategies in the later-borne to promote their own success.
The strong survive to pass of their genes and the weak do not; Darwin’s concept
of natural selection at its simplest, and in layman’s terms this is the root of
sibling rivalry. This idea may seem more applicable to giant tortoises than
humans, but the notion has been seen as compelling enough to spark mountains of
research into the effects of birth order on development.
Later
this topic was carried on by Sir Francis Galton. He believed that humans have
ability to improve. He concluded from his research that only first born child
and only born child become famous and well known scientists. This statement was
given on the basis of custom of ‘primogeniture’. According to this custom only
first born child inherits family fortune. After this many scientist came in and
followed the results of this research till Alfred Adler came and decided to
take a deeper look deeper look into the relation of birth order and their
personality.
Self esteem
Self-esteem reflects a person's
overall emotional evaluation of his or her own worth. It is a judgment of oneself
as well as an attitude toward the self. Self-esteem encompasses beliefs and emotions such as triumph, despair,
pride and shame
.Smith and Mackie define it by saying:
"The
self-concept is what we think
about the self; self-esteem is the positive or negative evaluations of the
self, as in how we feel about it.”
Self-esteem
is also known as the evaluative dimension of the self that includes feelings of
worthiness, prides and discouragement. One's self-esteem is also
closely associated with self-consciousness.
Birth order and self esteem: direct relation
Birth order
and self esteem was first linked by Cooper smith (1967) in this small stream
research. He has a point of view that birth order has effect on self esteem.
Being first born slightly enhances the possibility of developing positive self
esteem. Similarly, there is indication that child without sibling tends to have
higher self esteem than those who have them. Although there is no casual relation between
these two but general understanding is that due to first in all children,
parents give more attention than those who arrive later.
The
thoughts and actions of an individual are greatly influenced by child’s self
esteem. The bulk of childhood development of self-esteem is done during
childhood and adolescence. During this crucial time period, most influential
persons are parents. Learning of self esteem is based on how others react,
especially their parents it has been speculated that this could be explained
either because new parents are overly anxious about their first child, or
perhaps because when the second child is born, attention must be split between
the two siblings. Later-born children do not receive as extensive attention as
firstborns and often feel less appreciated. Therefore, later born Children
often have lower self-esteem than first and only children (Wilson, 2002).
The study conducted on
Effects of Birth
Order upon Self-Esteem and Motivation in Middle-born by Zane A. Maus indicates
that middle-born would have lower self-esteem than that of only children,
first-borns. A statistical analysis of the data showed significant differences
in self-esteem in middle-borns in comparison to only children and first-borns;
however, the difference was not significant in comparison to last-borns. The results of the study indicate that birth
order is a significant factor upon self-esteem in individuals, but is not
necessarily a significant factor in motivation style.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Study of birth
order started over a century ago by Sir Francis Galton. After him many
scientist came in and followed the results of this research till Alfred Adler
came and argued that birth order often can leave an indelible impression on the
individual's style of life, which is a habitual way of dealing with the tasks
of friendship, love, and work. On the basis of birth order Adler identified
certain qualities of children.
The Firstborn Child: The
Achiever
The eldest child will probably
have more in common with other firstborns than their own brothers and sisters.
Because they have had so much control and attention from their first-time
parents, they tend to be over-responsible, well-behaved ,careful, Reliable,
Conscientious, Structured, Cautious, Controlling,
Achievers, Smaller versions of their own parents, Dominant in terms of
relationships, Perfectionist.
According to Adler first
born may experience adjustment problems when a family is expecting another
child and the child might experience a sense of loss. By losing seat on the
familial throne, he loses the special place that singularity holds. All of the
attention that was exclusively yours must now be shared by him and his sibling.
This may lead to sibling rivalry. On the other hand, younger siblings often
idolize the first born, putting the first born in a position of leader of the
children of the family.
The Middle Child: The Peacemaker
The middle child often
feels left out.
In general, middle children tend to possess the following
characteristics: People-pleasers, somewhat rebellious, Thrives on friendships, Has
large social circle, Peacemaker, understanding, cooperative,
flexible, Competitive,
negotiating and navigating powers
It is here that middle
child will find the attention likely lacking in family of origin. A middle
child receives the least amount of attention from family and as a result, this
family of his choice is compensation. Adler believed that the middle child
feels squeezed out of a position of privilege and significance. The child is
internally compelled to find peace within the family and may have trouble
finding a place or become a fighter of injustice.
The Youngest Child: The Life of the Party
Youngest children tend to be the most free-spirited due to
their parents' increasingly laissez-faire attitude towards parenting the second
(or third, or fourth, or fifth...) time around. The baby of the family tends to
be: Fun-loving, Uncomplicated, Manipulative, Outgoing, Attention-seeker, Self-centered,
Independent. As Adler theorized that the youngest child is often babied
or "pampered" more than the other siblings. This
"pampering," according to Adler, is one of the worst behaviors a
parent can bestow on a child. "Pampering" can lead to dependence, and
selfishness as well as irresponsibility when the youngest enters adulthood.
The Lone Wolf: The Only Child
Being the only child is a unique position in a family.
Without any siblings to compete with, the only child monopolizes his parents'
attention and resources, not just for a short period of time like a firstborn,
but forever. Only children have the burden of having all their parents' support
and expectations on their shoulders. Only child
have a lot in common with those who are first borns, as well as those who are
the youngest in their families. Thus, only children tend to be: Mature for their age, Perfectionists,
Conscientious, Diligent, Leaders, Verbal, resourceful,
creative ,
confident, Independent.
Twins
Twins tend to have one dominate twin, who acts as the first
born. However, this can sometimes not be the case. Because of twins' closeness,
they tend to be a lot more confident; however, they often have trouble being
alone and get lonely easily. When one twin gets married, this often causes
separation problems with both twins, and sometimes leads to depression. Twins,
especially identical twins, tend to be much closer than normal siblings.
They might have identity problems. Stronger one may become the leader.
Ghost
Child
Child born after the
death of the first child may have a "ghost" in front of him. Mother
may become over-protective or sometimes aggressive and careless. Child may
exploit mother's over-concern for his well-being, or he may rebel, and protest
the feeling of being compared to an idealized memory.
Adopted
Child
Parents may be so
thankful to have a child that they spoil him. They may try to compensate for
the loss of his biological parents. The age at which the child is adopted is a
key factor in which traits the child is most likely to exhibit. The younger the
child is at adoption, the more time he will spend under the adoptive parents'
care and adopt his position in the existing family tree. For instance, if a
firstborn 1-year-old is adopted by a family with a 4-year-old child, the
adopted child will likely fall into the role of the baby, despite the fact that
he is biologically a firstborn child.
Schwab
and Lundgren (1978) conducted two studies to check how self-esteem
is related to birth order. The first study was conducted on 82 male and 82
female undergraduate students about their self-esteem and second study was same
but examines possible differences between males and females. The results for
both the studies showed that self- esteem was higher for first-born children,
regardless of sex differences.
Falbo(1986)
conducted a study in which he studied the relationship between children’s birth
order and certain personality characteristics. While studying, he took 841
undergraduate males and 944 undergraduate females to complete several
personality tests and instruments and a background questionnaire that included
16-item device. The 16 item device was specially held to measure the
self-esteem of the participants. Falbo paid each participant three dollar as an
incentive to complete his survey questionnaires. After completion of study
Falbo draw a conclusion that the self esteem is relatively higher among the
firstborns than later born children. He also found that firstborn children tend
to take internal responsibility for their action and are competitive more than their
younger siblings.
Gates, Lineberger, Crockett, and
Hubbard (1988) conducted a research on birth order and how it is related to
self esteem and self concept. They used three different scales one of which was
measuring level of self concept. Participants (children) were from 7 to 12
years old and were selected from public and private schools. From the results
it was inferred that firstborn children scored high on self-concept than second
born or youngest born children indicating that first born have high self
esteem.
Furthermore,
an additional study conducted by Zervas & Sherman (1994), reaffirms the
previous findings. They surveyed 91 college students instead of parents and
asked about relation of perceived parental favoritism and their self esteem. Results
shown that those children who were identified as most favored has high level of
self esteem and reason behind being favored is position in their birth order.
62% participants who took part in survey stated that favoritism has links with
birth order and which has great impact on self esteem (Zervas & Sherman,
1994).
Shanahan,
Crouter & Osgood (2008) conducted a seven year longitudinal study in which
the mothers and fathers of 4th or
5thgrade children were given one-on-one home interviews to receive testimony
as to whether the parents viewed this particular child differently in
comparison to the rest of their children in the home. Factors such as maternal warmth,
maternal conflict, and sibling relationships were all considered upon assessing
the data. After concluding
the study, Shanahan, Crouter, and Osgood stated that the results of the study
indicated different treatment upon each of the children in the families and
that the middle-born children tended to receive less maternal warmth and had
more maternal conflicts than that of other siblings in the family (Shanahan,
Crouter, & Osgood, 2008) These
findings may suggest lower levels of self-esteem in middle-born children due to
the lack of interest and care from the primary care givers in his or her life.
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
Birth-order-
is the chronological order of sibling births in the family it’s also known as a
person rank by age among his or her siblings.
Self-esteem-
this is a feeling of self worth, a favorable impression about oneself. Having
good self-esteem brings about an easier time handling conflicts and resisting
negative pressure but low self-esteem brings about depression and leave without
skills necessary to overcome challenges.
METHODOLOGY
HYPOTHESIS
RESEARCH QUESTION
How
does birth order affect self-esteem? Is there a significant relation between
self esteem and birth order.
PARTICIPANTS
The
participants in our study include 30 randomly selected undergrad students of
FATIMA JINNAH WOMEN UNIVERSITY and NUML UNIVERSITY. Sampling involved. Ten students
each from different birth order such as ten first born, ten middle born and ten
last born. Age group of students involved 18-28 years.
INSTRUMENT
Instrument used for
this research is Rosenberg self esteem test 1965. This scale was developed by
DR. Morris Rosenberg to measure self esteem in population. This scale is likert
type and have ten items which are answered on a four point scale ranging from
strongly agree o strongly disagree. The scale is believed to be
uni-dimensional. Five of the items have positively worded statements and five
have negatively worded ones. The scale measures state self-esteem by asking the
respondents to reflect on their current feelings. The Rosenberg self-esteem
scale is considered a reliable and valid quantitative tool for self-esteem
assessment. It has internal consistency 0.77. Test retest ability for the two
week interval was 0.85 showing that this test is highly reliable and valid. (Appendix
A).
PROCEDURE
In
this study questionnaire were distributed to 30 participants. Oral consent was
taken from all of the participants and none of them had any issue on use of
data for research. Once the questionnaire was given participants were asked to
fill demographics first. Demographics involved their age, gender, birth order
and total siblings. Time of starting was recorded and participants were
encouraged if they will do it without their friend’s suggestions. Maximum time
taken by every participant was five minutes. And it took 3 days to complete the
data collection involving going to the location. Participants were encouraged
to ask questions if they have any difficulty. Participants were informed about
the purpose of research and answers to their every query were provided. No
ethical barrier was breached during this research.
DATA ANALYSIS
Data
was inserted in excel sheet where in every sheet data for first born, middle
born and last born was entered. Sums for every participant was calculated as
well as the mean of all participants were recorded. Certain Questions was
entered as reverse scored i.e.
Scoring Patterns:
Strongly Disagree= 1 point,
Disagree = 2 points,
Agree=3 points,
Strongly Agree=4 points.
Items 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 are reverse scored.
Strongly Disagree= 4 point,
Disagree = 3 points,
Agree=2 points,
Strongly Agree=1 points.
Sum scores for all ten items. Keep scores on a
continuous scale. Higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.
RESULTS
Data
for each group was entered in different excel sheet. Sheet one included data of
first born. The self esteem score for participants under first born were 30,29,
23, 29, 30, 33, 29, 28, 32, 34. Whereas the mean score of all participants was
29.7.
Similarly self esteem score for middle born were 26, 26, 30,
30, 25, 32, 26, 22, 37, 24 and for last born were 26, 26, 30, 24, 27, 23, 27,
31, 27, 21. The mean score for these two were 27.8 and 26.2 respectively.
Previous
researches affirm that first born usually possess high self esteem rather than
later born. Though the analysis of data indicated that
middle-born had lower self-esteem than last-born, the results were not
significant.
DISCUSSION:
Hypothesis
of this research was to see if self esteem of first born is higher than middle
born and last born. Statistical analysis of data showed that there is not much
significant difference in self esteem of first middle and last born.
Although this research did not showed
significant difference but many previous researches showed that self esteem and
birth order have relation. Because new parents are too much insecure about
their first child and give all attention and care to him. This could b one of
the reasons that later born get less attention and has low self esteem because
of it. Darwin gave concept of sibling rivalry which was later followed by Adler
and many other scientists . According to Adlerian
theory, middle-born will be at constant conflict with older siblings in order
to dethrone them and to gain power while simultaneously being envious of
younger siblings due to the attention they receive from their parents (Alfred
Adler, 2011). This factor is likely to cause significantly lower
levels of self-esteem as supported by previous research conducted by Kidwell
(Kidwell, 1981, 1982). In addition this constant struggle will also
cause the individual to become more motivated as supported by other previous
research (Snell, Hargrove, Falbo, 1986). The current research on
self-esteem supports the previously conducted research by stating that
first-borns have slightly higher levels of self-esteem compared to any other
position in the birth order
CONCLUSION
Birth
order has always played a vital role in life of every child. Birth order gives
the cues about personality and relationships with family as well as friends.
Research on birth order started way back when Darwin stated that “Children do
not inherit special genes for being firstborn or later born, only genes for
engaging successfully in competition for parental investment”, and this is what
leads to differing traits amongst siblings who have very similar genes. Later
this research was followed by Adler who proposed theory of birth order and
affiliate specific characteristics with every child. It was copper smith who for
the first time worked on relation of self esteem and birth order. Thoughts and actions of child are greatly
influence by child’s self esteem. During childhood, most influential people in child
life are parents and learning
of self esteem is based on how others react, especially their parents. The study conducted on
Effects of Birth Order upon Self-Esteem and Motivation in Middle-born by Zane
A. Maus indicates that middle-born would have lower self-esteem than that of
only children, first-borns. Similarly researchers like Falbo(1986) ,Schwab and Lundgren
(1978) ,Gates,
Lineberger, Crockett, and Hubbard (1988) ,Shanahan, Crouter & Osgood (2008) later proved the link of self esteem
with birth order. This research although did not proved any significant results
about first born having high self esteem then later born but only if data would
have been larger , it might be possible that difference between their self
esteem score would be more visible.
RESEARCH LIMITATON
The
research is done on the ordinal position much of the research done on birth
order may not be pliable to use because
the way in which a person’s perceive their birth order has more of an effect on their personalities then the
actual ordinal birth order.
Another
issue that comes up when looking at the research of birth order is that there
is not much research out there that has been done in recent years. Most of the
research that Explains birth order in depth was done many years back. The
recent research is more on the effects of birth order on a achievement and
carrier choices.
Study
sample is very small and could not be generalized. And the study is done on the
students of under grad if the same test would be taken from some other
population f rural area results would be different.
Other
factors that are ignored are family economic state, change of birth order
because of death of any sibling and if the other factors other than birth order
affecting self esteem such as being bullied or harassment of any kind.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
A
Therapist knowing the experiences of an individual growing up in a specific
order within their family can help the therapist utilize the client’s frame of
reference and help the client see their childhood experiences in a different
way. Knowing the birth order of the client can also help the therapist
understand the client’s symptoms and to change the behavior of person in better
way
References
http://national.deseretnews.com/article/509/birth-order-impacts-parenting-style-subsequent-academic-achievement.html
http://gradworks.umi.com/33/03/3303563.html
hey,
ReplyDeletei would like to know the name of the writer.
thanks
alin
i am the author of this mini study
ReplyDeleteHi miss! may i know your name please, i just want to use your study as a reference for my thesis if its just okay with you. :)
ReplyDeleteSheeza Mahak
ReplyDelete